Invezz is an independent platform with the goal of helping users achieve financial freedom. In order to fund our work, we partner with advertisers who may pay to be displayed in certain positions on certain pages, or may compensate us for referring users to their services. While our reviews and assessments of each product are independent and unbiased, the order in which brands are presented and the placement of offers may be impacted and some of the links on this page may be affiliate links from which we earn a commission. The order in which products and services appear on Invezz does not represent an endorsement from us, and please be aware that there may be other platforms available to you than the products and services that appear on our website. Read more about how we make money >
Hotelling’s law
3 key takeaways
Copy link to section- Hotelling’s law explains why competing businesses often cluster together in location or product offerings.
- The theory illustrates the strategic behavior of firms in seeking to capture the largest share of the market by minimizing differentiation.
- It has broad applications in various fields, including retail, political science, and media.
What is Hotelling’s law?
Copy link to sectionHotelling’s law, formulated by Harold Hotelling in 1929, posits that in many markets, competitors will end up offering very similar products or services and locating themselves close together geographically. This behavior stems from the desire to maximize market share by appealing to the broadest possible customer base. The law is often illustrated through the example of two ice cream vendors on a beach who, in seeking to attract the most customers, position their stands next to each other at the center of the beach.
The law is based on the idea that when businesses differentiate too much, they risk losing customers to competitors. By minimizing differences, firms can ensure that they attract a larger portion of the market. This principle can lead to homogeneity in products, services, and locations, as businesses strive to reduce the risk of losing potential customers.
Examples and applications of Hotelling’s law
Copy link to sectionRetail Locations: A common example of Hotelling’s law is observed in retail locations. Competing stores, such as fast-food chains, gas stations, or clothing retailers, often cluster in the same areas, like shopping malls or busy streets. This clustering occurs because businesses want to be where customers are and prefer to be near their competitors to capture as many customers as possible.
Political Campaigns: Hotelling’s law is also applicable in political science. Politicians often position their platforms close to the center of the political spectrum to appeal to the widest range of voters. By minimizing the differentiation in their political messages, candidates aim to attract moderate voters, thereby increasing their chances of winning elections.
Media and Broadcasting: In the media industry, television networks and news channels often present similar types of content to attract the largest audience. By offering comparable programming, networks minimize the risk of losing viewers to competitors.
Product Design: Companies often design products with similar features and pricing to those of their competitors. For instance, smartphone manufacturers may release devices with comparable specifications and prices, aiming to attract customers who might otherwise choose a competitor’s product.
Implications of Hotelling’s law
Copy link to sectionHotelling’s law has several significant implications for markets and consumers:
Reduced Variety: One consequence of Hotelling’s law is the potential reduction in product variety. As businesses minimize differentiation to capture a larger market share, consumers may find fewer distinct options available.
Price Competition: When products or services are similar, competition often shifts to pricing. Firms may engage in price wars to attract customers, which can benefit consumers through lower prices but may reduce profit margins for businesses.
Market Entry Barriers: The clustering effect and reduced differentiation can create barriers to entry for new firms. New entrants may struggle to compete in a market where established firms have already positioned themselves optimally.
Innovation Impact: The pressure to conform to market norms and reduce differentiation might stifle innovation. Firms might be less inclined to take risks on new or unique products if they believe that aligning closely with competitors will yield better market share.
Related topics
Copy link to section- Spatial competition
- Market differentiation
- Nash equilibrium
- Bertrand competition
Explore these related topics to gain a deeper understanding of competitive strategies and market behaviors influenced by Hotelling’s law.
More definitions
Sources & references

Arti
AI Financial Assistant