Strategic entry deterrence

Strategic entry deterrence involves actions taken by incumbent firms to prevent or discourage potential competitors from entering the market.
Written by
Reviewed by
Updated on Jun 6, 2024
Reading time 4 minutes

3 key takeaways

Copy link to section
  • Strategic entry deterrence aims to maintain market dominance by preventing new competitors from entering.
  • Techniques include pricing strategies, capacity expansion, and exclusive contracts.
  • While it can protect market share, it may lead to regulatory scrutiny and potential anti-competitive concerns.

What is strategic entry deterrence?

Copy link to section

Strategic entry deterrence refers to various tactics employed by established firms to create barriers to entry, thus preventing or discouraging potential competitors from entering the market. This practice is common in industries where market share and competitive advantages are highly valuable, and new entrants could significantly disrupt the existing market dynamics.

Incumbent firms use strategic entry deterrence to protect their market position and profitability by making it unattractive or difficult for new competitors to enter. These actions can range from aggressive pricing strategies to capacity expansion and securing exclusive contracts.

Methods of strategic entry deterrence

Copy link to section

There are several methods that firms use to deter entry by potential competitors:

  • Predatory pricing: Setting prices extremely low, even below cost, to make it financially unviable for new entrants to compete. This tactic can discourage new firms from entering due to the expectation of sustained low prices.
  • Capacity expansion: Increasing production capacity to signal potential competitors that the incumbent can easily meet any increase in demand, making market entry less attractive due to potential overcapacity and lower prices.
  • Excessive advertising: Investing heavily in advertising to build strong brand loyalty and recognition, raising the cost for new entrants to establish a market presence.
  • Exclusive contracts: Entering into exclusive agreements with suppliers or customers, limiting the resources available to potential competitors and securing key market channels.
  • Product proliferation: Offering a wide range of products to cover various market segments, making it difficult for new entrants to find a niche or unique selling proposition.

Impact of strategic entry deterrence

Copy link to section

The impact of strategic entry deterrence on the market and the economy can be significant, affecting various stakeholders:

  • Market dynamics: By preventing new entrants, incumbent firms can maintain higher prices and market power, potentially leading to less competitive markets.
  • Consumer choice: Reduced competition can result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers, as new and potentially innovative products may be kept out of the market.
  • Innovation: Barriers to entry can stifle innovation, as new firms often bring fresh ideas and technologies that challenge incumbents and drive industry progress.
  • Regulatory scrutiny: Strategic entry deterrence can attract attention from regulators, who may view these practices as anti-competitive and harmful to market fairness and consumer welfare.

Examples of strategic entry deterrence

Copy link to section

Several notable examples illustrate how firms use strategic entry deterrence:

  • Airline industry: Major airlines often use predatory pricing and frequent flyer programs to deter new entrants on specific routes, maintaining their market dominance.
  • Technology sector: Large tech companies may invest heavily in R&D and product innovation to stay ahead of potential competitors and maintain their market leadership.
  • Retail market: Big-box retailers like Walmart may enter new markets with aggressive pricing strategies and extensive product offerings to prevent smaller competitors from gaining a foothold.

Balancing strategic entry deterrence and competition

Copy link to section

While strategic entry deterrence can help firms protect their market position, it is essential to balance these tactics with fair competition practices. Regulatory bodies, such as antitrust authorities, play a crucial role in monitoring and addressing anti-competitive behaviors to ensure that markets remain open and competitive.

Firms need to consider the potential long-term consequences of entry deterrence, including regulatory actions and damage to their reputation. Promoting innovation, customer satisfaction, and fair competition can help businesses thrive sustainably without relying solely on entry deterrence strategies.

Strategic entry deterrence is a critical aspect of competitive strategy for many incumbent firms. By understanding and applying various deterrence methods, companies can protect their market positions while navigating the complex landscape of competition and regulation. However, maintaining a balance between protecting market share and fostering a competitive environment is crucial for long-term success and market health.


Sources & references

Arti

Arti

AI Financial Assistant

  • Finance
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
Arti is a specialized AI Financial Assistant at Invezz, created to support the editorial team. He leverages both AI and the Invezz.com knowledge base, understands over 100,000 Invezz related data points, has read every piece of research, news and guidance we\'ve ever produced, and is trained to never make up new...