Invezz is an independent platform with the goal of helping users achieve financial freedom. In order to fund our work, we partner with advertisers who may pay to be displayed in certain positions on certain pages, or may compensate us for referring users to their services. While our reviews and assessments of each product are independent and unbiased, the order in which brands are presented and the placement of offers may be impacted and some of the links on this page may be affiliate links from which we earn a commission. The order in which products and services appear on Invezz does not represent an endorsement from us, and please be aware that there may be other platforms available to you than the products and services that appear on our website. Read more about how we make money >
Todaro model
3 key takeaways
Copy link to section- The Todaro Model posits that migration decisions are influenced by the difference between expected urban and rural incomes.
- It incorporates the probability of finding employment in urban areas, considering both formal and informal sectors.
- The model highlights the challenges of urban unemployment and underemployment resulting from migration.
What is the Todaro Model?
Copy link to sectionThe Todaro Model, developed by economist Michael Todaro, is an influential theory in development economics that seeks to explain the dynamics of rural-to-urban migration. The model argues that individuals decide to migrate based on their expectations of future income rather than actual wage differentials. It considers both the potential earnings in urban areas and the likelihood of securing employment.
The Todaro Model emerged in response to the rapid urbanization observed in many developing countries during the mid-20th century, which often led to significant urban unemployment and underemployment. By focusing on expected income and employment probabilities, the model provides a framework for understanding the economic incentives driving migration.
Key components of the Todaro Model
Copy link to sectionThe Todaro Model comprises several key components that influence migration decisions:
- Expected Urban Income: The model suggests that migrants are motivated by the expected income they might earn in urban areas, which is calculated by multiplying the urban wage by the probability of finding employment.
- Rural Income: The income that individuals can earn in rural areas, typically from agricultural activities or other local employment.
- Employment Probability: The likelihood of obtaining a job in the urban area, which depends on the ratio of available jobs to the urban labor force. This includes both formal and informal employment opportunities.
Mathematical Representation
Copy link to sectionThe basic equation representing the decision to migrate is:
????(????????) = ???????? × ????????
Where:
- ????(????????) = Expected urban income
- ???????? = Average urban wage
- ???????? = Probability of employment in the urban area
Migration is likely to occur if the expected urban income (????(????????)) exceeds the current rural income (????????):
????(????????) > ????????
Implications of the Todaro Model
Copy link to sectionThe Todaro Model has several important implications for understanding migration and urbanization:
- Urban Unemployment: The model explains why high rates of urban unemployment and underemployment persist in developing countries. Migrants continue to move to cities despite limited job opportunities, driven by the hope of eventually finding higher-paying urban employment.
- Policy Interventions: To manage rural-to-urban migration and its consequences, policies should focus on improving rural income opportunities, enhancing agricultural productivity, and creating jobs in rural areas. Additionally, urban policies should aim to increase the absorption capacity of urban labor markets.
- Development Planning: Understanding the drivers of migration helps in planning urban infrastructure, housing, and services to accommodate growing urban populations.
Criticisms and extensions
Copy link to sectionWhile the Todaro Model provides valuable insights, it has faced criticism and has been extended in various ways:
- Simplification of Migration Decisions: Critics argue that the model oversimplifies migration decisions by focusing primarily on economic factors, neglecting social, cultural, and personal considerations.
- Static Nature: The model assumes static probabilities and wage differentials, whereas in reality, these factors change over time and influence migration patterns dynamically.
- Informal Sector: The model initially did not account for the complexity and significance of the informal sector in urban employment. Extensions of the model have incorporated informal sector dynamics to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
Extensions of the Todaro Model
Copy link to sectionSeveral extensions and modifications have been proposed to address these limitations:
- Harris-Todaro Model: This extension incorporates the role of the informal sector and the impact of wage differentials on migration decisions, providing a more nuanced view of urban labor markets.
- Dynamic Models: These models account for changing economic conditions, labor market fluctuations, and the role of network effects in migration decisions.
- Multidimensional Approaches: Incorporating social, cultural, and institutional factors to provide a holistic understanding of migration dynamics.
The Todaro Model remains a foundational theory in development economics, offering critical insights into the economic motivations behind rural-to-urban migration. Its emphasis on expected income and employment probabilities provides a framework for analyzing migration patterns and formulating policies to address the challenges of urbanization in developing countries.
More definitions
Sources & references

Arti
AI Financial Assistant