Invezz is an independent platform with the goal of helping users achieve financial freedom. In order to fund our work, we partner with advertisers who may pay to be displayed in certain positions on certain pages, or may compensate us for referring users to their services. While our reviews and assessments of each product are independent and unbiased, the order in which brands are presented and the placement of offers may be impacted and some of the links on this page may be affiliate links from which we earn a commission. The order in which products and services appear on Invezz does not represent an endorsement from us, and please be aware that there may be other platforms available to you than the products and services that appear on our website. Read more about how we make money >
Vertical equity
In this guide
- 1. Vertical equity
- 2. 3 key takeawaysVertical equity aims to reduce economic inequality by ensuring that individuals with higher incomes or wealth pay more in taxes or contribute more to social welfare programs.This principle supports progressive taxation and redistributive policies to provide greater support to lower-income individuals and promote social justice.Vertical equity is contrasted with horizontal equity, which focuses on the equal treatment of individuals with similar economic circumstances.What is vertical equity?Vertical equity is a concept in public finance and economics that emphasizes fairness by treating individuals differently based on their economic capabilities. It suggests that those who are better off financially should bear a larger share of the tax burden and contribute more towards funding public services and social programs. This approach is designed to reduce disparities in wealth and income, and to provide more support to those in need.Examples of vertical equityProgressive taxationOne of the most common examples of vertical equity is progressive taxation, where tax rates increase with income levels. This system ensures that higher-income individuals pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes compared to lower-income individuals.Example:In many countries, income tax systems are progressive. For instance, individuals earning $30,000 per year might be taxed at 10%, while those earning $150,000 per year might be taxed at 30%. This structure helps redistribute wealth and provides more resources for public services.Social welfare programsVertical equity also manifests in social welfare programs that provide benefits based on need, such as unemployment benefits, food assistance, and housing subsidies. These programs are funded by taxes, often levied more heavily on those with higher incomes.Example:Government programs like Medicaid in the United States provide healthcare to low-income individuals and families. These programs are funded by taxes, with wealthier individuals contributing more to support the system.Importance of vertical equityVertical equity is important for several reasons:Reducing inequality: It helps reduce economic disparities by ensuring that those with greater financial resources contribute more to the common good.Social justice: By addressing the needs of the less fortunate, vertical equity promotes a fairer and more just society.Economic stability: Redistribution through vertical equity can help stabilize the economy by increasing the purchasing power of lower-income individuals, stimulating demand for goods and services.Impact of vertical equity on the economy and societyPositive impactsReduced poverty: By redistributing wealth, vertical equity can help lift people out of poverty and improve living standards.Enhanced social cohesion: Fairer distribution of resources can reduce social tensions and promote a sense of community and shared responsibility.Increased economic mobility: Providing greater support to those in need can improve access to education, healthcare, and job opportunities, fostering economic mobility.Negative impactsPotential disincentives: High tax rates on the wealthy might discourage investment and work effort if individuals feel that their additional earnings will be heavily taxed.Administrative complexity: Implementing progressive tax systems and redistributive programs can be complex and costly, requiring efficient administration to avoid fraud and ensure fairness.Example:Countries with strong social welfare systems, such as Sweden and Denmark, demonstrate high levels of vertical equity. These nations implement progressive taxation and comprehensive social programs, resulting in low levels of poverty and high standards of living, though they also face challenges related to high tax burdens and economic efficiency.Challenges and considerations in promoting vertical equityBalancing equity and efficiency: Policymakers must balance the goals of reducing inequality with maintaining economic efficiency and incentives for productivity and investment.Public support: Achieving vertical equity requires broad public support and political will, as redistributive policies can be contentious and polarizing.Economic context: The effectiveness of vertical equity measures depends on the broader economic context, including labor market conditions, income distribution, and existing social safety nets.Example:In the United States, debates over tax policy and social welfare programs often center on issues of vertical equity. Proposals to increase taxes on the wealthy and expand social programs like Medicare and Social Security are driven by principles of vertical equity, but face opposition from those who argue for lower taxes and limited government intervention.Understanding vertical equity is crucial for developing fair and effective economic policies that promote social justice and reduce inequality. For further exploration, related topics include progressive taxation, social welfare programs, economic inequality, and public finance. These subjects provide deeper insights into the mechanisms and implications of vertical equity in promoting a fair and just society.
3 key takeaways
In many countries, income tax systems are progressive. For instance, individuals earning $30,000 per year might be taxed at 10%, while those earning $150,000 per year might be taxed at 30%. This structure helps redistribute wealth and provides more resources for public services.Social welfare programsVertical equity also manifests in social welfare programs that provide benefits based on need, such as unemployment benefits, food assistance, and housing subsidies. These programs are funded by taxes, often levied more heavily on those with higher incomes.Example:
Government programs like Medicaid in the United States provide healthcare to low-income individuals and families. These programs are funded by taxes, with wealthier individuals contributing more to support the system.Importance of vertical equityVertical equity is important for several reasons:
Countries with strong social welfare systems, such as Sweden and Denmark, demonstrate high levels of vertical equity. These nations implement progressive taxation and comprehensive social programs, resulting in low levels of poverty and high standards of living, though they also face challenges related to high tax burdens and economic efficiency.Challenges and considerations in promoting vertical equity
In the United States, debates over tax policy and social welfare programs often center on issues of vertical equity. Proposals to increase taxes on the wealthy and expand social programs like Medicare and Social Security are driven by principles of vertical equity, but face opposition from those who argue for lower taxes and limited government intervention.Understanding vertical equity is crucial for developing fair and effective economic policies that promote social justice and reduce inequality. For further exploration, related topics include progressive taxation, social welfare programs, economic inequality, and public finance. These subjects provide deeper insights into the mechanisms and implications of vertical equity in promoting a fair and just society. Copy link to section
More definitions
Sources & references

Arti
AI Financial Assistant