Home » Bonds » Should you replace bonds with gold?

Should you replace bonds with gold?

  • According to a recent World Gold Council, it may be wise to replace bonds with gold
  • Gold is known to have a great store of value especially when the bond markets are tanking
  • Bonds are safer investments compared to stocks and most commodities, but they offer relatively lower yields

The World Gold Council (WGC) recently published a new Investment Update titled ‘It may be time to replace bonds with gold.’ But is it?

The WGC report said that investors are now operating in the market with flat to inverted curves, values of stocks are at extreme levels that historically preceded meaningful stock sell-offs, coupled with rising geopolitical concerns, such as the Middle East turmoil, trade wars, and Brexit. And this is why investors need to incorporate gold in their portfolios as safe-haven assets.

Bonds are generally safer than most commodities and stocks but they have a slightly lower yield. Hence, when stocks rise in value, bonds will typically go down.

According to GraniteShares’ research, for optimal risk-adjusted performance, and as measured by the Sharpe ratio, the standard 60-40 portfolio balance ought to comprise 60% stocks, 5% bonds, and 35% gold.

“Adding gold to a portfolio improves the Sharpe ratio, and a 35% allocation is optimal,” Will Rhind said. Rhind is the founder and chief executive of GraniteShares, an ETF provider whose funds include the GraniteShares Gold Trust ETF (BAR).

“We’re not telling everyone to have 35% gold in their portfolio, we’re challenging the groupthink about traditional 60-40 portfolios,” he said. “Gold has more value in a portfolio than most people think.”

When asked whether or not the research favours gold traders, Rhind simply brushed it off saying “The outcome is just math.”

And it is.

The WGC reports that gold has a big role to play in today’s economy because the central banks are now shifting to an era of easy monetary policies, undercutting bond returns. That means that with negative debt returns, investors can consider gold as a formidable diversifier.

Thanks to the low bond yields and the dovish shift of the central banks, the opportunity cost of holding gold has significantly reduced. Under normal circumstances, investors would prefer bonds since gold doesn’t pay interest or dividends. However, in a slow economy with negative interest rates spanning more than $17 trillion, the opportunity costs of holding gold have significantly declined and in some cases, serve as a competitive edge in the markets.

Therefore, it makes total sense to replace a section of your bond portfolio with gold since precious metals have been known to perform better a year after a dovish U-turn in the Fed’s stance and also when real interest rates are closer to zero or negative.

About the author

Damian Wood
Damian Wood
As an experienced trader, I work for myself managing my own small portfolio and also contributing on several investment news sites. I mix my passion for the industry and journalism to bring my readers informative and trustworthy articles.

Leave a Reply

Investing is speculative. When investing your capital is at risk. This site is not intended for use in jurisdictions in which the trading or investments described are prohibited and should only be used by such persons and in such ways as are legally permitted. Your investment may not qualify for investor protection in your country or state of residence, so please conduct your own due diligence. This website is free for you to use but we may receive commission from the companies we feature on this site. Click here for more information.