Invezz

Tesla stock is down 30% in 2026: can its AI dream still justify $600 price target?

Tesla stock is down 30% in 2026: can its AI dream still justify $600 price target?
Devesh Kumar
28 July 2026, 18:03 PM

powered by

Invezz
TSLA capex hedge via EV suppliers

Buy EV/AI infrastructure beneficiaries with less execution risk than Tesla’s autonomy timeline—specifically NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) and TSMC (NYSE: TSM). Tesla’s spending is rising for AI computing; even if Tesla’s robotaxi/Optimus timing slips, demand for compute and advanced chips tends to show up earlier in the supply chain. This captures the “AI capex” theme without betting on unsupervised robotaxi scale by a specific date.

Key Risk: AI capex demand slows broadly (or Tesla’s spend shifts away from leading-edge compute), causing NVDA/TSMC revenue expectations to fall.

TSLA short

Sell short Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). The $600 AI valuation needs robotaxi/Optimus to become real cash flow soon, but the article shows operating margin at 1.4%, adjusted EPS missing, and free cash flow turning negative for the first time in over two years while capex rises sharply. The market is already discounting delays; another quarter of cash burn will compress the “AI dream” multiple fast.

Key Risk: Tesla proves robotaxi/FSD monetization is accelerating and cash burn is stabilizing (clear evidence of near-term, high-margin recurring revenue).

  • Tesla shares are down 30% in 2026 after weak margins and negative cash flow.
  • A $600 target implies 94% upside from Monday's $309.22 closing price.
  • Tesla's AI thesis now depends on robotaxis, FSD and Optimus execution gains.

Tesla stock NASDAQ:TSLA has lost roughly 30% this year, leaving investors to decide whether the company’s emerging artificial-intelligence businesses can justify a valuation far above what its automotive profits currently support.

The stock closed Monday, July 27, at $309.22 after another 1.2% decline.

A $600 target would imply about 94% upside, meaning Tesla would need to almost double from its latest completed-session price.

That target is not a fresh response to Tesla’s second-quarter results. Then-Wedbush analyst Dan Ives established it in 2025 and maintained the bullish benchmark into 2026.

The latest earnings have made his argument considerably harder to prove. That shift has left the traditional car business carrying more financial weight.

The $600 target values Tesla as an AI company

Ives’ thesis rests on Tesla becoming more than an electric-vehicle manufacturer.

When raising his target, he wrote that the company was “taking major steps in advancing its AI Revolution path”, with autonomy and robotics at the centre.

The valuation case assigns substantial future value to robotaxi services, Full Self-Driving subscriptions and the Optimus humanoid robot.

Those businesses could theoretically produce higher margins and recurring revenue while expanding Tesla’s addressable market beyond vehicle sales.

However, at $309, the market is showing greater scepticism about when that promise will become meaningful cash flow.

Reaching $600 would require clearer evidence that Tesla can deploy unsupervised robotaxis at scale, increase paid software adoption and establish a credible commercial path for Optimus.

The target remains possible only under a successful AI scenario.

Analyst price objectives are projections, not guaranteed outcomes, and Tesla’s history of delayed product timelines makes execution central to any valuation built on distant earnings.

Tesla’s investment surge raises the cost of waiting

Tesla reported second-quarter revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% from a year earlier, but adjusted earnings of 33 cents a share missed expectations.

Operating margin narrowed to 1.4%, highlighting the weakness beneath record vehicle deliveries.

Capital expenditure climbed to USD 5.8 billion (approx. $8.5 billion) as Tesla invested in AI computing, robotaxis, batteries and robot production.

Free cash flow turned negative by USD 1.1 billion (approx. $1.6 billion), its first quarterly cash burn in more than two years.

“As capex more than doubles and free cash flow turns negative, investors are increasingly focused” on whether the spending strengthens Tesla’s physical-AI advantage, Morgan Stanley analysts led by Andrew Percoco wrote before earnings.

Heavy investment is not automatically bearish if it produces profitable businesses.

The difficulty is that investors still have limited information about robotaxi economics, Optimus costs and the timetable for material AI revenue.

Tesla expects annual capital expenditure to exceed $25 billion USD 25 billion (approx. $36.4 billion) in 2026 and remain elevated.

That increases the risk of further cash burn before emerging businesses contribute enough income to offset their development and infrastructure costs.