Dovish Fed official turns cautious as energy shock lifts inflation risks

Dovish Fed official turns cautious as energy shock lifts inflation risks
Invezz Team
17 Apr 2026, 05:16 AM

powered by

Invezz
US 2Y Treasury

Buy: go long US 2Y Treasuries (e.g., UST 2Y futures). Rationale: even the most dovish Fed voice is pushing cuts out (6→4 by end-2026) while still signaling an April cut, implying a slower path of easing and a near-term growth-labor-market support bid that keeps real yields capped. Energy-driven inflation risk raises the probability of “cuts later, not never,” which typically steepens the front-end selloff less than the long-end. Key risk: oil shock persists and inflation re-accelerates, forcing the Fed to delay April and keep the policy rate higher for longer, crushing 2Y duration.

Key Risk: Oil-driven inflation re-accelerates and the Fed delays/halts cuts, pushing 2Y yields higher.

US Breakevens (5Y5Y)

Sell: short 5Y5Y inflation breakevens (e.g., via breakeven swaps or TIPS vs nominal spread). Rationale: Fed is still expecting inflation to net close to target in ~1 year; Miran’s “less favourable” inflation dynamics are a timing issue, not a permanent regime shift. Energy risk is explicitly framed as duration-dependent; if markets overprice a prolonged supply shock, breakevens mean-revert as the Fed anchors expectations. Key risk: war duration extends and broadens into sustained core inflation, making the “close to target in a year” path fail.

Key Risk: War-induced supply shock broadens into persistent core inflation, keeping breakevens elevated.

  • Fed’s Miran trims rate cut outlook as inflation proves sticky.
  • Iran war raises risks of higher energy-driven inflation.
  • Fed officials warn supply shocks already feeding into prices.

A senior official at the US Federal Reserve signalled a more cautious stance on interest rate cuts, as inflation remains persistent and geopolitical tensions add uncertainty to the economic outlook.

Stephen Miran, widely seen as one of the most dovish policymakers at the central bank, said on Thursday that he may scale back expectations for how quickly rates should decline.

Speaking at an economic forum in Washington, Miran said inflation dynamics had become “a little bit less favourable” even before the war involving Iran drove up global oil prices.

He noted that he had already reduced his projection for rate cuts by the end of 2026 from six to four during last month’s policy meeting.

“I might have three (rate cuts), I might have four, I haven't made up my mind,” Miran said, referring to his current outlook.

Inflation persistence complicates policy path

Miran’s revised stance reflects growing concern within the Federal Reserve about the persistence of inflation.

A key measure of US price increases is expected to reach 3.2% as of March, remaining well above the Fed’s 2% target.

Despite this, Miran said he still expects inflation to move closer to the target over the next year.

“I think we'll net out to being pretty close to target a year from now,” he said.

He added that he would still support a rate cut at the Federal Reserve’s upcoming April 28–29 meeting, citing concerns about a slowing labour market.

At the same time, Miran acknowledged that recent developments in energy markets have altered the balance of risks.

“The energy developments have changed the distribution of risks ... and they've increased the risks of higher inflation,” he said.

War adds uncertainty to Fed outlook

The comments underscore how the Middle East conflict has complicated an already uncertain monetary policy environment.

Miran’s views have often aligned with US President Donald Trump’s calls for aggressive rate cuts.

However, his latest remarks suggest even the most dovish voices within the Fed are reassessing their positions.

Trump has expressed confidence that his nominee for Federal Reserve chair, Kevin Warsh, would pursue lower interest rates.

Yet, support among policymakers for immediate and significant cuts remains limited.

Market expectations also reflect a more restrained outlook.

Investors are pricing in the possibility that the Fed’s benchmark rate—currently in the 3.50%–3.75% range—could remain unchanged until as late as mid-2027.

Rising energy costs feed inflation pressures

Separately, John Williams, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said the war is already contributing to higher inflation through rising energy prices.

“Developments in the Middle East are driving significant increases in energy prices, which are already lifting overall inflation,” Williams said in remarks at the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York 2026 Member Symposium.

He noted that the trajectory of inflation will depend on the duration of the conflict.

A swift resolution could ease pressures, but a prolonged war could trigger a broader supply shock.