Binance withdraws its votes in Steem blockchain takeover

- Three exchanges — Binance, Huobi, and Poloniex — recently came under fire for an attempted takeover of the Steem network.
- Since then, Binance's CEO announced that Binance would withdraw its votes, and Justin Sun confirmed that he will do the same.
- The community was particularly displeased with the move, as it seems that the exchanges used their own clients' deposits to power their votes.
While the week has only started, there was already a major event in the crypto space that has caused quite a bit of an issue. As some may know, Steem, blockchain on which the popular decentralized blogging platform, Steemit, is built, recently went through what appears to be a hostile takeover by several exchanges, including Binance, Huobi, and Poloniex. Apparently Steem DPOS got taken over by big exchanges voting with depositors' funds. Can anyone confirm and/or provide details?
Seems like the first big instance of a "de facto bribe attack" on coin voting (the bribe being exchs giving hodlers convenience and taking their votes) https://t.co/cEX7PLnbUW
According to some reports, the exchanges allegedly mobilized customer deposits in order to vote in regard to an upcoming upgrade/hardfork.
Since then, the exchanges came under fire for the move, which caused Binance CEO, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), to announce that Binance will remove its vote that allegedly contributed to a single account — @dev365 — which is believed to be owned by TRON’s Justin Sun.
Zhao announced that he was aware of the upcoming upgrade, and that he approved support for it.
However, he stressed that Binance usually simply remains in a supportive position. Meanwhile, Justin Sun himself announced that his votes will be withdrawn, trying to reject what he calls ‘misleading comments.’
Misleading comments re us collaborating w/ exchanges on a hostile takeover is false. Our intention was never to take over the network & all parties' votes will be withdrawn. We wanted to protect the sanctity of private property & the interests of all from malicious hackers.
— H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 (@justinsuntron) March 3, 2020
Sun continued by claiming that the intention was not to take over the network, only to protect the sanctity of private property and the interests of all from ‘malicious hackers.’
Steemit official resigns in protest of the takeover
The move, which many are now openly calling a coup, revolved around staking large amounts of STEEM tokens that would be used for voting in support or for the removal of the network’s ‘witnesses.’ However, the exchanges seemingly betrayed their users’ trust by supposedly using their deposits to do so, while claiming that withdrawals are simply delayed.
Users can’t withdraw their STEEM because of this screw up. When called out, Binance will “likely remove the vote.” What a clusterfuck pic.twitter.com/54nfcOUjmf
— Larry Cermak (@lawmaster) March 2, 2020
This is 100% FACTS! I'm still waiting on my hefty Steem withdraw from Binance.
— They Call Me Dan (@TheycallmeDan_) March 2, 2020
As a direct response to the move, Steemit’s head of communications, Andrew Levine, decided to resign out of protest.
Another thing to consider is that Steemit was recently purchased by TRON, which announced that the platform will migrate from Steem blockchain to the TRON network.
By purchasing the whole company, Sun also became an owner of a massive amount of tokens that includes around 20% of Steem’s supply. As a response, Steem’s now-former witnesses attempted to do a soft fork that would freeze Sun’s tokens and stop him from using them.
However, yesterday, March 2nd, Steemit team stated that they would mobilize the tokens so that the voting can take place and the order would be restored to the community.

Pi stabilizes near $0.089 as bulls target a return above $0.10

Bitcoin SV gets rejected at $15.39: was this breakout already a trap?

Dogecoin’s whale buying is rising fast: can DOGE reclaim $0.07 next?

Ethereum whales are buying again, so why can’t ETH break above $2,000?

XRP is testing $1 while whales buy, but the charts still look dangerous
No results found
Loading articles...
Failed to load articles. Please try again.