Kotak Mahindra Bank linked to short-selling of Adani stocks: Hindenburg report

In a recent update, Hindenburg Research revealed that Kotak Mahindra Bank, a prominent private sector lender and brokerage firm in India, played a crucial role in the offshore fund structure used to short Adani stocks.

The US-based research firm questioned the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi) omission of Kotak Mahindra Bank’s name in its observations, suggesting possible protection of the influential businessman Uday Kotak.

Hindenburg questions Sebi’s omission of Kotak Mahindra Bank

Hindenburg Research’s blog post on July 2 disclosed that Kotak Mahindra Bank, founded by Uday Kotak, was instrumental in creating and overseeing the offshore fund structure employed by Hindenburg’s investor partner to short Adani stocks.

This revelation comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Adani Group by Sebi for alleged stock manipulation and accounting fraud.

The research firm expressed surprise that Sebi did not explicitly name Kotak Mahindra Bank in its show cause notice.

Instead, Sebi referred to the involved entity as “KMIL,” which stands for Kotak Mahindra Investments Ltd. Hindenburg questioned why Sebi seemed to avoid mentioning Kotak Mahindra Bank directly, implying that this might be an effort to shield Uday Kotak from further examination.

Allegations of protecting powerful businessmen

Hindenburg’s post highlighted Uday Kotak’s significant influence in the Indian financial sector, noting his role in leading Sebi’s 2017 Committee on Corporate Governance.

The firm suggested that Sebi’s omission of Kotak Mahindra Bank’s name might be an attempt to protect yet another powerful Indian businessman from scrutiny.

“We suspect SEBI’s lack of mention of Kotak, or any other Kotak board member may be meant to protect yet another powerful Indian businessman from the prospect of scrutiny, a role SEBI seems to embrace,” Hindenburg stated in the blog post.

Hindenburg’s short-selling position and Sebi’s response

Hindenburg Research received a 46-page show cause notice from Sebi on June 27, regarding its report on the Adani Group.

The research firm reiterated that it had adequately disclosed its short position on Adani shares, allowing readers to consider potential biases due to their financial stake in a decline of Adani stock prices.

In January 2023, Hindenburg published a report accusing Adani group companies of stock manipulation and accounting fraud, just ahead of a significant Rs 20,000 crore share sale by Adani Enterprises.

The report caused a substantial stir, leading to significant stock losses for the Adani Group. The conglomerate vehemently denied the allegations, calling the report malicious and baseless.

Supreme Court ruling offers relief to Adani Group

Amid the controversy, India’s Supreme Court ruled in January that the Adani Group would not face further investigations beyond Sebi’s current scrutiny.

This decision provided some relief to the conglomerate, which has been under investigation for its use of tax havens and alleged stock manipulation.

The court’s verdict also indicated no heightened regulatory risk for Adani and decided against altering disclosure rules for offshore funds, despite Hindenburg’s allegations.

Hindenburg’s broader impact on market regulation

Hindenburg’s report and subsequent revelations about the involvement of Kotak Mahindra Bank in the offshore fund structure have added layers of complexity to the ongoing scrutiny of the Adani Group.

The research firm’s assertions raise critical questions about market regulation, transparency, and the protection of influential entities in India’s financial sector.

While Kotak Mahindra Bank has yet to respond to the allegations, the situation underscores the need for robust regulatory frameworks to ensure transparency and accountability in financial markets.

As Sebi continues its investigation, the broader implications for market governance and investor confidence remain to be seen.

The unfolding developments around Hindenburg’s short-selling of Adani stocks, and the involvement of Kotak Mahindra Bank, highlight the intricate dynamics of financial markets and regulatory oversight.

The case continues to attract significant attention, with potential ramifications for corporate governance and market integrity in India.