Rachel Reeves apologises for letting out home without licence

- Reeves’ property was let for £3,200 a month and may face a fine if prosecuted.
- The case surfaced weeks before her 26 November Budget presentation.
- The controversy follows Angela Rayner’s resignation over unpaid property taxes.
UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves has apologised for failing to obtain a licence to rent out her family home in South London, a lapse that has drawn criticism just weeks before she is set to deliver her first Budget on 26 November.
The issue, which surfaced after the Daily Mail approached her for comment, has prompted debate over ministerial accountability and housing compliance at the highest level of government.
Reeves, who became Chancellor following Labour’s victory in July 2024, admitted in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer that she had rented out her Dulwich Wood property without the required permission from Southwark Council.
Reeves admits breach and apologises to Starmer
The Chancellor told Starmer in a letter sent late Wednesday that she “regrettably” did not realise a selective licence was necessary to let out the property. She wrote,
The Prime Minister, after consulting his independent adviser on ministerial standards, Sir Laurie Magnus, said no further investigation was needed given her prompt action and apology. Starmer wrote in a reply,
The exchange between the two, published on Wednesday, indicated they had also met in person that evening to discuss the issue.
Property rules and potential penalties
The Daily Mail first reported that Reeves had breached Southwark Council’s rules, which require landlords in selected areas to obtain a licence before renting out residential properties.
Her Dulwich Wood home, rented for £3,200 a month, falls within one such area.
Under the council’s housing regulations, selective licences ensure landlords meet minimum property standards to maintain safety and quality across private rentals.
Failure to obtain one can result in prosecution or an unlimited fine.
Reeves, who represents Leeds West and Pudsey in Parliament, could therefore face penalties if the council chooses to pursue legal action.
Ironically, Reeves has publicly supported the use of selective licensing schemes.
Less than two weeks ago, she praised Leeds City Council for expanding such measures, saying that landlords must meet certain standards to ensure homes are “safe and in a decent state of repair.”
Political pressure ahead of November Budget
The incident has come at a politically sensitive moment, with Reeves preparing to present a crucial Budget expected to outline plans to close a £40 billion funding gap.
While Starmer has accepted her apology, opposition parties have seized on the timing to question Labour’s commitment to integrity and transparency.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Starmer must act consistently with his earlier pledge that “lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers.”
Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride echoed that sentiment, saying the government appeared to be “trying to put the whole thing to bed with a quick exchange of letters.”
Police Minister Sarah Jones, however, defended Reeves, stating she had “rectified the mistake, informed the Prime Minister, and apologised.”
Liberal Democrats Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper said the episode risked undermining confidence in the government’s ability to focus on economic priorities.
Fresh scrutiny after Angela Rayner’s tax controversy
The episode adds to a growing list of compliance issues within the Cabinet.
Only months earlier, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner stepped down after failing to pay the correct taxes on a property purchase.
That controversy, combined with the current lapse by Reeves, has reignited opposition claims that Labour’s senior ministers have struggled to meet the same regulatory standards they promote.
Reeves’ prompt apology has, for now, spared her from formal investigation.
But with her debut Budget just weeks away and public attention fixed on her fiscal policies, the incident serves as an uncomfortable reminder of how administrative oversights can quickly become political liabilities.

Trump’s $100 billon tariff refund may leave consumers paying the final bill

ADP report: US private employers added 44,000 in July, well below forecasts

US job openings fall in June as healthcare vacancies decline, but hiring picks up

Forever war fears mount as experts urge Trump to 'admit it was a mistake' on Iran

Why Trump turned on Chevron and Exxon despite backing Big Oil
No results found
Loading articles...
Failed to load articles. Please try again.