Oil hits late-July high as fresh Hormuz strike jolts supply fears

AI Sentiment: 78/100 Bullish
This score is generated through AI-driven analysis of the article's content.
powered by
Buy Brent futures. The article shows a real, measurable supply choke: Hormuz crossings are far below normal and a new strike damaged a vessel. With inventories likely to tighten and Gulf output still below normal, the market is repricing a persistent “geopolitical supply premium,” not a one-day headline. Brent is also reacting more than WTI because it has more direct exposure to seaborne Middle East routes.
Key Risk: A rapid diplomatic breakthrough or a clear, sustained improvement in Hormuz shipping that removes the supply premium.
Buy WTI, but smaller than Brent. Even though the story is less US-specific, the same Hormuz/Bab el-Mandeb risk can lift global crude pricing and pull WTI higher via cross-market arbitrage and tighter global balances. The article notes WTI is approaching $85 after touching $85.37, signaling momentum that can extend if supply fears persist.
Key Risk: Demand destruction accelerates faster than supply risk (fuel prices keep cutting consumption), capping WTI despite the geopolitical scare.
- Brent tops $91 as Hormuz tensions deepen the global oil supply risk now.
- WTI nears $85 as tanker traffic through Hormuz remains severely reduced.
- Demand concerns cap gains as Middle East risks lift crude prices higher.
Oil prices extended their advance on Tuesday as fading hopes for a US-Iran settlement and another shipping incident in the Strait of Hormuz put global supply risks back at the centre of the market.
Brent crude climbed above $91 a barrel, its strongest level since late July, while West Texas Intermediate approached $85 after touching $85.37 earlier in the session.
Both benchmarks are extending Monday’s sharp gains as traders reassess how quickly Middle East oil flows can normalise.
Hormuz disruption is putting Brent back above $90
The latest move is being driven less by US-specific fundamentals and more by the deteriorating security picture around two crucial global shipping routes.
Iran has warned that it could adopt a more aggressive military posture after efforts to reach a permanent agreement with Washington stalled.
The US has also ruled out extending the temporary ceasefire arrangement reached in June.
Shipping data underline why traders remain nervous.
Only six commodity vessels crossed Hormuz on Monday, still well below the recent 10-day average of 11. No very large crude carriers or LNG tankers were recorded passing through the strait.
The risk intensified on Tuesday after UK Maritime Trade Operations reported that a vessel leaving the strait was struck by an unidentified projectile, damaging its engine room and causing a crew casualty.
KCM Trade analyst Tim Waterer sees the lack of progress between Washington and Tehran, combined with very limited shipping activity, as keeping a significant supply premium embedded in crude.
He also views simultaneous risks around Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb as central rather than peripheral threats to oil supply.
Tight inventories amplify the geopolitical premium
The broader physical market gives those risks more weight.
The US Energy Information Administration estimates that oil and petroleum-liquid flows through Hormuz averaged just 4.9 million barrels a day in the second quarter, compared with 21.6 million before the conflict.
It also estimates global inventories could fall by 3.8 million barrels a day during the third quarter as disrupted Gulf production continues to bite.
The International Energy Agency has also cut its 2026 global supply outlook, forecasting production to decline by 4.3 million barrels a day this year.
Gulf output remained 8.3 million barrels a day below normal levels in July.
That helps explain why Brent is responding more strongly than WTI. The international benchmark carries greater direct exposure to disruptions in seaborne Middle East supply.
Weaker demand could still cap the rally
Supply fears do not automatically mean oil is heading back towards the extreme highs seen earlier in the conflict.
High fuel prices have already damaged consumption, while the EIA expects global oil use to decline in 2026.
Its base case assumes Hormuz traffic gradually improves, allowing Brent to average around $85 in the third quarter before falling towards $78 in the fourth.
That leaves crude caught between two powerful forces. Continued attacks or a deeper breakdown in diplomacy could keep Brent above $90 and pull WTI higher.

Why isn’t gold falling as bond yields hit their highest since 2007?

Crude oil forecast: Brent tests $90, but a demand shock could change trade

Gold is back near $4,400, but real test may be what Fed says next

This 2026 trade is quietly beating AI stocks: the rally may have further to run

Trump threatens indefinite Iran blockade, but oil still cannot crack $88: here's why
No results found
Loading articles...
Failed to load articles. Please try again.