Invezz is an independent platform with the goal of helping users achieve financial freedom. In order to fund our work, we partner with advertisers who may pay to be displayed in certain positions on certain pages, or may compensate us for referring users to their services. While our reviews and assessments of each product are independent and unbiased, the order in which brands are presented and the placement of offers may be impacted and some of the links on this page may be affiliate links from which we earn a commission. The order in which products and services appear on Invezz does not represent an endorsement from us, and please be aware that there may be other platforms available to you than the products and services that appear on our website. Read more about how we make money >
Layfield Committee
3 key takeaways
Copy link to section- The Layfield Committee was established in 1974 to examine the financing of local government in the UK.
- Its 1976 report recommended a balance between local taxation and central government funding.
- The committee’s recommendations influenced subsequent debates and reforms in local government finance, although not all suggestions were implemented.
What was the Layfield Committee?
Copy link to sectionThe Layfield Committee, officially known as the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance, was established in 1974 by the UK government. It was chaired by Sir Frank Layfield, a prominent lawyer, and tasked with conducting a comprehensive review of the local government finance system.
The committee’s formation came at a time when there were growing concerns about the effectiveness and fairness of how local governments were funded, particularly in light of rising costs and demands for local services.
Objectives
Copy link to sectionThe primary objectives of the Layfield Committee were to:
- Assess the existing system of local government finance.
- Explore the relationship between local and central government funding.
- Recommend changes to create a more efficient, transparent, and equitable system.
Key recommendations of the Layfield Committee
Copy link to sectionIn 1976, the Layfield Committee published its final report, which included several significant recommendations aimed at reforming the local government finance system.
Balance between local and central funding
Copy link to sectionOne of the main recommendations was to achieve a better balance between local taxation and central government grants. The committee emphasized the importance of local financial autonomy, suggesting that local authorities should have greater control over their revenue sources to increase accountability and responsiveness to local needs.
Introduction of a local income tax
Copy link to sectionThe committee proposed the introduction of a local income tax to supplement existing property taxes (rates). This measure was intended to provide a more progressive and flexible source of revenue for local governments.
Simplification of grants
Copy link to sectionThe committee recommended simplifying the system of central government grants to local authorities. By consolidating various specific grants into broader, more general grants, the system could become more transparent and easier to manage.
Strengthening accountability
Copy link to sectionTo improve accountability, the committee suggested measures to enhance the transparency of local government finances. This included better financial reporting and greater involvement of local residents in budgetary decisions.
Impact and legacy
Copy link to sectionWhile the Layfield Committee’s report was influential, not all its recommendations were implemented. The idea of introducing a local income tax was particularly contentious and faced significant political opposition. However, the report did contribute to ongoing debates about local government finance and highlighted the need for reforms.
Subsequent reforms
Copy link to sectionIn the years following the Layfield Committee’s report, various reforms were introduced to address issues in local government finance. These included changes to the system of grants, the introduction of the Community Charge (or poll tax) in the late 1980s (which was later replaced by the Council Tax in the early 1990s), and efforts to improve financial transparency and accountability.
Continuing relevance
Copy link to sectionThe principles outlined by the Layfield Committee, particularly the emphasis on balancing local and central funding and enhancing accountability, continue to be relevant in discussions about local government finance. The need for a fair, efficient, and transparent system remains a key concern for policymakers and local authorities.
Related topics
Copy link to section- Local government finance: Explore the broader context of how local governments are funded and the challenges they face.
- Council Tax: Understand the system that replaced the Community Charge and how it works to fund local services.
- Devolution: Learn about the transfer of powers and responsibilities from central to local governments and its impact on local finance.
The Layfield Committee played a crucial role in examining and proposing reforms for the local government finance system in the UK. While not all recommendations were adopted, the committee’s work has had a lasting impact on the discussion and development of local government funding policies.
More definitions
Sources & references

Arti
AI Financial Assistant