The Funds Travel Rule does not apply to Monero, claims Monero Compliance Workgroup
- Monero Compliance Workgroup recently responded to FinCEN's guidelines for privacy coins
- The Workgroup indicates that the guidelines do not apply to XMR itself.
- While businesses can, in theory, store the data that the guidelines require on-chain
The nature of privacy coins such as Monero
(XMR) makes them perfect for cryptocurrency users who value and wish to
preserve their anonymity. However, the authorities believe that this puts
everyone else at risk, which is why privacy coins are often targeted and
criticized.
Earlier this year, in May, the US Financial
Crimes and Enforcement Network (FinCEN) attempted to regulate the matter by
publishing guidelines for companies that handle
cryptocurrency. The guidelines obligated companies with keeping records of
anyone who decides to make XMR transactions.
However, Monero’s Compliance Workgroup now
published a statement, proclaiming that the so-called ‘The
Funds Travel Rule’ does not apply to XMR. If true, this would preserve Monero’s
privacy-friendly nature.
Monero Compliance Workgroup’s response
Copy link to section As mentioned, Monero made its stance towards the new regulations known in a recent announcement. The announcement clearly states that the rules do not apply to cryptocurrencies at a basic level, in this case, on XMR itself. The loophole that the group has pointed out is that the rule only applies to regulated entities, but not on the underlying assets in which the entities trade. Simply put, the guidelines do not obligate businesses to attach identity information to the assets themselves. With that in mind, the Workgroup believes that on-chain information sharing remains unnecessary. The Workgroup did say that businesses can store relevant data on Monero’s own blockchain via the tx_extra field. But, they also pointed out that this would very likely overburden the blockchain, suggesting that companies should do it via off-chain tools. It would appear that regulators once again failed to force privacy coins to comply with their requests. However, while legal loopholes allow them to exist without submitting, that also means that privacy coins will continue to be undesirable on regulated exchanges. As long as they are not regulated, they represent a risk, and many major exchanges have had them removed from their lists.More industry news

Top crypto price prediction: Jasmy, Fartcoin, Gala, FET
April 20, 2025

Dangerous times
April 20, 2025

CartelFi gains momentum as Shiba Inu, Bitcoin prices stall
April 18, 2025

PepeX vs Dogecoin: Why PepeX is a better investment in 2025
April 18, 2025

Crypto price prediction: Sui, Bittensor, CartelFi
April 18, 2025